Frozen British Pensions April 2018 #2

The Commonwealth Heads of Government Meetings provide a chance to air the problem of frozen pensions, not necessarily at the meeting itself but certainly on the sidelines of the meeting and in the social media space around it. This year’s meeting was no exception. Publicity and support comes in a number of interesting ways. One example was the two AdVans driving around with the message below, while John Duffy of the International Consortium of British Pensioners, pictured, was busy attending forums and generally raising awareness among the various delegations.

A particularly welcome boost to the cause came from Richard Branson who dwelt at some length on his website about the issue. Some extracts from his recent post (19 April) provide a good summary of the situation and indicate what some of his 3 million followers may be reading.

The policy means almost half of all pensioners living overseas do not receive increases in their pension payments and their pension remains at the same level for their entire lives.
 
It’s an uneven policy as British pensioners in some countries get the increased payments whereas others are frozen. More than 95 per cent of those affected live in Commonwealth countries, most in Australia, Canada, South Africa and New Zealand, but also India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, many Caribbean islands and all African countries, except Mauritius where pensions are indexed.
 
The system seems very unfair. A pensioner aged 90 living on a frozen pension would receive £41.25 per week, whereas a pensioner retiring today would get £155 per week. The different amounts are based on where they live and nothing else.

The International Consortium of British Pensioners – led by Sheila Telford – is working to get the government to reconsider their policy. They have the support of a number of MPs and are hoping a solution can be found to alleviate the hardship faced by many. The cost to solve the problem would be just 0.7 per cent of the pensions budget in 2017.

It is good to see that Sir Richard is supporting the cause despite not being in such dire straits that he feels the need to fall back on the apparently meagre resources of the UK government in his tropical hideaway or wherever. He maintains that he will never retire and will not be claiming a UK pension.

Also working tirelessly to promote the issue is the UK All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on frozen pensions. Their stated aim is for partial uprating as a compromise between the current situation and a full uprating. The latter would enable all pensioners to receive the full pension going forward so all pensioners wherever situate would receive the same amount. Partial uprating would give the hitherto frozen pensioners the annual increases but without taking into account earlier annual increases foregone. This stance is not accepted by some. Points made by the APPG include:

  • The compromise involves a negligible first year cost of £37 million;
  • In time the problem would work itself out of the system;
  • ‘Full’ uprating could well prompt back-claims for the loss of full pension up to the date the new policy becomes effective, something the government doesn’t want to contemplate.
  • To the extent that the new policy would remove the disincentive to emigrate from UK the government would save £3,800 per person pa. This is a government figure and obviously applies equally to current frozen pensioners.
  • It is procedurally simple to implement.

While these arguments are understood, it would be particularly galling for the very old trying to get by on less than one third of the current pension.

Frozen pensioners will no doubt have mixed feelings about efforts to ensure UK expat pensioners in the EU do not lose their rights to the annual increases on Brexit.

Sources and references: http://frozenbritishpensions.org/; https://www.virgin.com/richard-branson; http://www.pensionjustice.org;

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Frozen British Pensions April 2018 #2

  1. The saving of £3,800 per annum per pensioner is an old and inaccurate number. The UK Government never conceded that this number is correct. The Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) have said that “£1,500 per person would be nearer the mark”. Even so, when there are 1.2 million UK pensioners living overseas, the annual saving is still £1.8 Billion, which is more than adequate to uprate pensions. Add to that the nearly £6 Billion excess sitting in the National Insurance Fund (NIF). This fund is used to pay our pensions, and since the system is a “pay as you go” system, this is OUR money we are talking about. #scandalous #immoral #discriminatory #giveusourmoneyback

    Like

  2. Sirs,

    The power of the media has been displayed vividly in recent days with regard to the shocking treatment of commonwealth immigrants by the home office. These same people will now be recognised as having full rights to remain in the UK along with rights to benefits,NHS trearment and state pensions .The UK government have been acutely embarassed by press and TV coverage of the Windrush affair and has acted quickly to right the wrongs perpetrated on these people.
    We must now await the power of the media being used to defend these same people from being swindled out of their pension increases by the DWP should they venture to enjoy retirement in their sun kissed homelands. Do not hold your breath ,the British government are beyond embarassment on this issue and the media have moved on to the next big stor.y

    George Baddelely .
    Western Australia.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s